Do you see any similarities between the early channel 4 and an independent film production company?
There are many similarities between the early Channel 4 and an independent film production company.
Channel 4 is as unique as a commerical broadcaster as it has a public service remit. This means that rather than its primary concern being to make money for shareholders it exists to fulfil a public need. The remit stipulates that they must, demonstrate innovation, experiment and creativity in the form and content of programmes. It must appeal to the tastes and interests of a culturally diverse society. Make a significant contribution to meeting the need for the licensed public service channels to include programmes of an educational nature and other programmes of educative value. And also broadcast programmes from many independent production companies, including a high proportion from Europe.
This is the same for an independent film production. Like Film Four. Film Fours Ethos is to help develop new British talent. This is so that everyone gets a chance in the acting world. They are also the leader of innovation in the British Film Industry. They also support international and independent Film makers. Offering a platform for British and independent cinema on terrestrial television by committing to showing each one of Film Four Production on Channel 4.
This is just like channel 4. The first night saw the beginning of its relationship with British, independent cinema with the premiere of Walter.
Both are commercial broadcasters. Both try to produce a realism within society.
How do you think the move in 1993 to being a more commercially motivated broadcaster, with the ability to sell their own advertising space, affected Channel 4's acquisition and commissioning decisions?
In 1993 channel 4 became in charge of its own advertising space. Whereas, before ITV was in control of Channel 4s advertising. This was an advantage as it was able to advertise its acquisitions. Such as 'ER', 'Friends' and 'Simpson's'. This allowed channel 4 to acquisition and commission more programmes than it usually would. I think that the affect that channel 4 got when it was able to get hold of its own advertising space allowed them to make more money, and advertise their own programmes showed on their channel. Even though this made them more money, that thought over took them, making them stray from their original remit.
In what ways do you think Channel 4 have lead to innovations in British Television?
Channel 4 lead to innovations in British Television, when it showed Walter on its first night. This movie featured scenes of homosexual molestation in a mental hospital. This was a shock to the nation. However, this lead to other channels copying and taking on the idea of trying something new. It also lead to innovations in the updating the world with news. News on channel 4 is more formal, educated and unbiased. Compared to news programmes on other channels such as, ITV. When looked at in another aspect, if channel 4 news was to be a newspaper, it would be a broadsheet and news on ITV would be a tabloid.
How has Channel 4 strayed from the ethos of it's original remit as a public service broadcaster to showcase innovation and diversity in television?
Channel 4 began to stray from its ethos of it's original remit as a public service broadcaster to showcase innovation and diversity, when it goy hold of its own advertising space. The fact of making more money bcecame the most important factor to them. For example take the programes which they used to show on teaching. This was showen in the mornings, usually when school for children was not on. This was to help education be followed through the channels. However, as channel 4 has progressed this factor of education has disappeared. It has been taken over by entertainment. Channel 4 said that they were a broadcaster to showcase innovation and diversity. They have now strayed from this. The educatioal programme which had first been shown, has now been taken over by comedies, such as Fraiser, and Everybody loves Raymond. Instead of demonstrating innovation, experimant and creativity, their number one priority is now entertainment. Not appealing to a diverse audience.
Does the factual programming on Channel 4 today have the same educational value as it did 25 years ago?
No, channel 4 does not have the same factual programming value as it did 25 years ago. They used to program documentaries, on various things. However this value has been lost and hidden. Channel 4 now seem to concentrate on entertaining their audience. Showing programs such as Come Dine With Me. This has no educational purpose to it at all. However, the conflict that sometimes takes place has more entertainment value. Which channel 4 seems will appeal to the wider audience. Channel 4 has lost a real important value, making the channel less factual.
Are there any arguments to say that Channel 4 still, in some ways maintain it's original remit?
Yes, it can be argued that channel 4 still contains some of its orginal remit, up to a certain extent. Channel 4 may not show as much edcucational or factual programs its meant to, but it still shows a few. Such as Dispatches. This gives different aspects of certain topics. Giving a educationa side and a more factual side. They also show programs which give a certain affect on the audiece. Such as Embrassing Bodies. This may be off putting to some, but there is alot of things and facts which can be taken on board, and applied to real life.
Is Channel 4's ownership of Film 4 Productions an example of Horizontal or Vertical Integration?
It is vertical as channel 4 owns Film 4 productions. Therefore, channel 4 is the parent company and Film 4 is a subsidary at a different stage which channel 4 owns. Channel 4 is a broadcaster and Film 4 makes movies.
There are many similarities between the early Channel 4 and an independent film production company.
Channel 4 is as unique as a commerical broadcaster as it has a public service remit. This means that rather than its primary concern being to make money for shareholders it exists to fulfil a public need. The remit stipulates that they must, demonstrate innovation, experiment and creativity in the form and content of programmes. It must appeal to the tastes and interests of a culturally diverse society. Make a significant contribution to meeting the need for the licensed public service channels to include programmes of an educational nature and other programmes of educative value. And also broadcast programmes from many independent production companies, including a high proportion from Europe.
This is the same for an independent film production. Like Film Four. Film Fours Ethos is to help develop new British talent. This is so that everyone gets a chance in the acting world. They are also the leader of innovation in the British Film Industry. They also support international and independent Film makers. Offering a platform for British and independent cinema on terrestrial television by committing to showing each one of Film Four Production on Channel 4.
This is just like channel 4. The first night saw the beginning of its relationship with British, independent cinema with the premiere of Walter.
Both are commercial broadcasters. Both try to produce a realism within society.
How do you think the move in 1993 to being a more commercially motivated broadcaster, with the ability to sell their own advertising space, affected Channel 4's acquisition and commissioning decisions?
In 1993 channel 4 became in charge of its own advertising space. Whereas, before ITV was in control of Channel 4s advertising. This was an advantage as it was able to advertise its acquisitions. Such as 'ER', 'Friends' and 'Simpson's'. This allowed channel 4 to acquisition and commission more programmes than it usually would. I think that the affect that channel 4 got when it was able to get hold of its own advertising space allowed them to make more money, and advertise their own programmes showed on their channel. Even though this made them more money, that thought over took them, making them stray from their original remit.
In what ways do you think Channel 4 have lead to innovations in British Television?
Channel 4 lead to innovations in British Television, when it showed Walter on its first night. This movie featured scenes of homosexual molestation in a mental hospital. This was a shock to the nation. However, this lead to other channels copying and taking on the idea of trying something new. It also lead to innovations in the updating the world with news. News on channel 4 is more formal, educated and unbiased. Compared to news programmes on other channels such as, ITV. When looked at in another aspect, if channel 4 news was to be a newspaper, it would be a broadsheet and news on ITV would be a tabloid.
How has Channel 4 strayed from the ethos of it's original remit as a public service broadcaster to showcase innovation and diversity in television?
Channel 4 began to stray from its ethos of it's original remit as a public service broadcaster to showcase innovation and diversity, when it goy hold of its own advertising space. The fact of making more money bcecame the most important factor to them. For example take the programes which they used to show on teaching. This was showen in the mornings, usually when school for children was not on. This was to help education be followed through the channels. However, as channel 4 has progressed this factor of education has disappeared. It has been taken over by entertainment. Channel 4 said that they were a broadcaster to showcase innovation and diversity. They have now strayed from this. The educatioal programme which had first been shown, has now been taken over by comedies, such as Fraiser, and Everybody loves Raymond. Instead of demonstrating innovation, experimant and creativity, their number one priority is now entertainment. Not appealing to a diverse audience.
Does the factual programming on Channel 4 today have the same educational value as it did 25 years ago?
No, channel 4 does not have the same factual programming value as it did 25 years ago. They used to program documentaries, on various things. However this value has been lost and hidden. Channel 4 now seem to concentrate on entertaining their audience. Showing programs such as Come Dine With Me. This has no educational purpose to it at all. However, the conflict that sometimes takes place has more entertainment value. Which channel 4 seems will appeal to the wider audience. Channel 4 has lost a real important value, making the channel less factual.
Are there any arguments to say that Channel 4 still, in some ways maintain it's original remit?
Yes, it can be argued that channel 4 still contains some of its orginal remit, up to a certain extent. Channel 4 may not show as much edcucational or factual programs its meant to, but it still shows a few. Such as Dispatches. This gives different aspects of certain topics. Giving a educationa side and a more factual side. They also show programs which give a certain affect on the audiece. Such as Embrassing Bodies. This may be off putting to some, but there is alot of things and facts which can be taken on board, and applied to real life.
Is Channel 4's ownership of Film 4 Productions an example of Horizontal or Vertical Integration?
It is vertical as channel 4 owns Film 4 productions. Therefore, channel 4 is the parent company and Film 4 is a subsidary at a different stage which channel 4 owns. Channel 4 is a broadcaster and Film 4 makes movies.